A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between potential neighbours more than the construction of a wall at a coastal web page in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes captivated nationwide interest adhering to an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed household household at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of preparing breaches, environmental problems, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Occasions posting about René Collier as well as Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a local disagreement has developed right into a extremely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around construction will work at the website on Dublin Street, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a firm director respectively, seek out to build their family members household. The case has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, in which development pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of founded residents. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being produced by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below organizing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally inhabitants of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their planning permission by building a wall outside of the boundaries in their internet site, bringing about an encroachment with a Exclusive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore regions are subject to rigorous controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments could have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly within a sensitive coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach of their arranging permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partly created, is in the proper position. Their legal team has characterised the action as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding in order to protect their look at, an allegation that has been recurring in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, exactly where views of the sea are equally extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the site, according to sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded through waist-substantial drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image which has considering that grow to be emblematic in the depth on the dispute. These actions were not basically symbolic; they had been intended to Obtain visual evidence on the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning with the sea Irish Periods reported, describing how the two Males entered the h2o in the course of significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm water to photograph the internet site grew to become Among the most hanging descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Occasions report about accountant Paul Feely observed that these actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location affected by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been covered intimately with the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as readers sought to know the qualifications and implications Rene Collier and Paul Feely of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders really should be granted to halt building pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment inside the lawful timeline.
For the core of your dispute is often a disagreement above boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage the wall, as built, goes further than what was accredited and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is called meticulous in his assessment of arranging files, maps, and disorders connected to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their action is motivated by problem for environmental safety and adherence to arranging legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting instead that it's about making certain that improvement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have described their lengthy-standing relationship to the area as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few just wanting to produce a family members house in accordance With all the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on the Particular Place of Conservation and say that every one operates are already carried out depending on Expert assistance and authorized options. Their lawyers have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes entering The ocean throughout a storm, do not alter the underlying points.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute more than building of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for your predicament that numerous observers see as ever more typical. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation in between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Instances short article about René Collier famous the businessman had Formerly been associated with area advocacy on arranging and environmental problems, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from very distinct Skilled backgrounds can find them selves aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site in the sea Irish Moments coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waistline-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations and René Collier waded by waistline-superior drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared repeatedly in protection, reflecting each the Bodily reality in the coastline as well as symbolic nature of your act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these actions shown determination; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an excessive strategy.
Because the High Court proceedings continue on, the end result remains unsure. The court docket ought to decide whether the wall as built complies with scheduling permission and whether any encroachment into a Exclusive Space of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and organizing circumstances. Nonetheless the human component remains central: neighbours who will have to live alongside one another prolonged after the authorized costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend further than that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the necessity of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. What's more, it underscores how quickly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary concerns including environmental protection and assets rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a location of purely natural elegance and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre of the dispute stands partially built, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. Whether or not it's going to in the end be altered, eradicated, or accomplished as prepared will rely on the court docket’s results. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will likely carry on to look in headlines, linked indelibly to One of the more intently watched planning disputes in north Dublin lately.